Review



6444s rrid ab 396457 rabbit anti human tox af488  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc 6444s rrid ab 396457 rabbit anti human tox af488
    6444s Rrid Ab 396457 Rabbit Anti Human Tox Af488, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 50 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+human+tcf1+antibody/pm41928520-217-32-39?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 50 article reviews
    6444s rrid ab 396457 rabbit anti human tox af488 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    95/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    95
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc 6444s rrid ab 396457 rabbit anti human tox af488
    6444s Rrid Ab 396457 Rabbit Anti Human Tox Af488, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+human+tcf1+antibody/pm41928520-217-32-39?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    6444s rrid ab 396457 rabbit anti human tox af488 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti human mouse tcf1 tcf7 af647
    KEY RESOURCES TABLE
    Anti Human Mouse Tcf1 Tcf7 Af647, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+human+tcf1+antibody/pmc11416765-55-0-6?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti human mouse tcf1 tcf7 af647 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti mouse human tcf1 clone c63d9
    CXCR6 expression increases upon ICB and is repressed by <t>TCF1</t> (A and B) Left: tumor area (y axis, mean ± SEM) over time (x axis) of Mc38Ova hi (A) or B16Ova (B) implanted in wild-type (WT) mice and treated with anti-PD1 (A), anti-PD-L1 + anti-TIM3 (B), or isotype control. Right: frequency of CXCR6 + cells (y axis, mean ± SEM) in the indicated subsets (x axis) of CD8 + TILs harvested from tumors treated as above (A: n = 4–6 per group, 1 experiment. B: n = 3–4 per group, 1 experiment). (C) Expression (row-normalized TPM, color bar) of top differentially expressed genes (rows) between WT OTI (E8i-Cre - , Tcf7 FL/FL ) and Tcf7 cKO OTI (E8i-Cre + , Tcf7 FL/FL ) cells at different time points after T cell activation (columns) ( n = 3, 1 experiment). (D) Mean expression (color bar) and fraction of expressing cells (dot size) of key genes (rows) in different CD8 + T cell clusters (columns) as determined by scRNA-seq of cells from B16Ova tumors implanted in WT or Tcf7 cKO mice ( n = 3 per group combined, 1 experiment). (E) Frequency of CXCR6 + cells (y axis, mean ± SEM) in the indicated subsets (x axis) of CD8 + TILs from B16Ova tumors from WT (black) or Tcf7 cKO (green) mice ( n = 3–7 per group, representative of 2 experiments). (F) Percent input (y axis, mean ± SEM) following chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) PCR of the Cxcr6 locus with anti-TCF1 or rabbit IgG control antibodies (x axis) in WT or Tcf7 cKO CD8 + T cells ( n = 8, 5 experiments combined). (G–I) Luciferase activity (RLU, relative light unit, y axis, mean ± SEM) in HEK293T cells transfected with Cxcr6 locus-containing pGL4.10 luciferase reporters together with either empty vector (control) or vectors encoding the indicated transcription factors (x axis). Firefly luciferase activity is presented relative to constitutive Renilla luciferase activity ( n = 3, representative of 2 experiments). Statistical significance was determined by linear mixed model (A left, B left), Student’s unpaired t test (A right, B right, E, F comparing WT to Tcf7 cKO anti-TCF1 samples), Student’s paired t test (F comparing WT samples), or one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (G, H, I). NS = not significant, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.
    Anti Mouse Human Tcf1 Clone C63d9, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+human+tcf1+antibody/pmc11293343-48-0-5?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti mouse human tcf1 clone c63d9 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti mouse human tcf1 pe clone c63d9
    CXCR6 expression increases upon ICB and is repressed by <t>TCF1</t> (A and B) Left: tumor area (y axis, mean ± SEM) over time (x axis) of Mc38Ova hi (A) or B16Ova (B) implanted in wild-type (WT) mice and treated with anti-PD1 (A), anti-PD-L1 + anti-TIM3 (B), or isotype control. Right: frequency of CXCR6 + cells (y axis, mean ± SEM) in the indicated subsets (x axis) of CD8 + TILs harvested from tumors treated as above (A: n = 4–6 per group, 1 experiment. B: n = 3–4 per group, 1 experiment). (C) Expression (row-normalized TPM, color bar) of top differentially expressed genes (rows) between WT OTI (E8i-Cre - , Tcf7 FL/FL ) and Tcf7 cKO OTI (E8i-Cre + , Tcf7 FL/FL ) cells at different time points after T cell activation (columns) ( n = 3, 1 experiment). (D) Mean expression (color bar) and fraction of expressing cells (dot size) of key genes (rows) in different CD8 + T cell clusters (columns) as determined by scRNA-seq of cells from B16Ova tumors implanted in WT or Tcf7 cKO mice ( n = 3 per group combined, 1 experiment). (E) Frequency of CXCR6 + cells (y axis, mean ± SEM) in the indicated subsets (x axis) of CD8 + TILs from B16Ova tumors from WT (black) or Tcf7 cKO (green) mice ( n = 3–7 per group, representative of 2 experiments). (F) Percent input (y axis, mean ± SEM) following chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) PCR of the Cxcr6 locus with anti-TCF1 or rabbit IgG control antibodies (x axis) in WT or Tcf7 cKO CD8 + T cells ( n = 8, 5 experiments combined). (G–I) Luciferase activity (RLU, relative light unit, y axis, mean ± SEM) in HEK293T cells transfected with Cxcr6 locus-containing pGL4.10 luciferase reporters together with either empty vector (control) or vectors encoding the indicated transcription factors (x axis). Firefly luciferase activity is presented relative to constitutive Renilla luciferase activity ( n = 3, representative of 2 experiments). Statistical significance was determined by linear mixed model (A left, B left), Student’s unpaired t test (A right, B right, E, F comparing WT to Tcf7 cKO anti-TCF1 samples), Student’s paired t test (F comparing WT samples), or one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (G, H, I). NS = not significant, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.
    Anti Mouse Human Tcf1 Pe Clone C63d9, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+human+tcf1+antibody/pmc11293343-47-0-6?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti mouse human tcf1 pe clone c63d9 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc human tcf1
    Figure 3. LDRT15 Gy/5 f + aPD-1 treatment recruits <t>TCF1+</t> PD-1+ CD8+ stem-like T cells (A) UMAP plot of 5,113 CD8+ T cells from scRNA-seq of untreated tumors and tumors treated with aPD-1, LDRT15 Gy/5 f, or LDRT15 Gy/5 f + aPD-1, colored by cell type. (B) Heatmap showing the expression of marker genes across CD8+ T cell subtypes. (C) Distribution of CD8+ T cell subtypes across treatment groups. Top bar plot showing the relative proportion of cells from four different treatment groups for each CD8+ T cell subtype. Bottom right heatmap showing enrichment scores of each CD8+ T cell subtype across treatment groups. The left bar plot shows the total number of CD8+ T cells in each treatment group.
    Human Tcf1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+human+tcf1+antibody/pm38964333-604-21-23?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human tcf1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti human tcf1
    Figure 3. LDRT15 Gy/5 f + aPD-1 treatment recruits <t>TCF1+</t> PD-1+ CD8+ stem-like T cells (A) UMAP plot of 5,113 CD8+ T cells from scRNA-seq of untreated tumors and tumors treated with aPD-1, LDRT15 Gy/5 f, or LDRT15 Gy/5 f + aPD-1, colored by cell type. (B) Heatmap showing the expression of marker genes across CD8+ T cell subtypes. (C) Distribution of CD8+ T cell subtypes across treatment groups. Top bar plot showing the relative proportion of cells from four different treatment groups for each CD8+ T cell subtype. Bottom right heatmap showing enrichment scores of each CD8+ T cell subtype across treatment groups. The left bar plot shows the total number of CD8+ T cells in each treatment group.
    Anti Human Tcf1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+human+tcf1+antibody/pmc11131576-825-27-29?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti human tcf1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti mouse human tcf1 af488

    Anti Mouse Human Tcf1 Af488, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+human+tcf1+antibody/pmc11148861-31-0-6?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti mouse human tcf1 af488 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit anti human tcf1

    Rabbit Anti Human Tcf1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+human+tcf1+antibody/us11965180-413-23-26?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti human tcf1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit anti-human tcf1/tcf7 c63d9
    a , Schematic summary of the design of exploratory analyses. b , Box plots showing the fold change in proportions of immune cell types among <t>PBMCs</t> in long-term responders (LR; n = 9), early progressors (EP; n = 9) and both ( n = 18). c , PCC of each cell type between C1D1 and C1D15. d , Bar plots showing the TCR diversity, as represented by the inverse Simpson index <t>for</t> <t>CD8</t> + T cells in LR ( n = 15) and EP ( n = 14) between C1D1 and C1D15. e , Box plots showing the fold change in the proportions of CD8 + T cell subclusters among NK/T cells among LR ( n = 9), EP ( n = 9) and both ( n = 18). f , Violin plots showing the module score for gene sets related to inflammatory signature (left) and nivolumab responsiveness in each CD8 + T cell cluster (right). g , Heat map showing expression levels of CD8 and genes related to cytotoxicity and T cell exhaustion among MKI67 + CD8 + T cells. h , Proportion of Ki-67 + cells among CD8 + T cells and PD-1 + CD8 + T cells, before and after treatment, among LR ( n = 7) and EP ( n = 8). i , Proportion of Granzyme B + perforin + cells among CD8 + T cells and PD-1 + CD8 + T cells, before and after treatment, among LR ( n = 7) and EP ( n = 8). Gating strategy of CD8 + T cells is shown in Extended Data Fig. . * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.005, **** P < 0.001, according to a Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired groups and two-tailed Mann–Whitney U -test for unpaired groups. Data are presented as mean ± s.d. In each box plot, the box represents the interquartile range, and whiskers represent minima and maxima. RCC, renal cell carcinoma.
    Rabbit Anti Human Tcf1/Tcf7 C63d9, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+human+tcf1+antibody/pmc10957471-330-21-29?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti-human tcf1/tcf7 c63d9 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    KEY RESOURCES TABLE

    Journal: Cell reports

    Article Title: Transcriptional programming mediated by the histone demethylase KDM5C regulates dendritic cell population heterogeneity and function

    doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114506

    Figure Lengend Snippet: KEY RESOURCES TABLE

    Article Snippet: Anti-human/mouse TCF1/TCF7 AF647 (clone C63D9) , Cell Signaling , 6709; RRID:AB_2797631.

    Techniques: Control, Blocking Assay, Virus, Recombinant, Protease Inhibitor, Lysis, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Staining, Cell Isolation, DNA Library Preparation, Purification, RNA HS Assay, Mutagenesis, Software

    CXCR6 expression increases upon ICB and is repressed by TCF1 (A and B) Left: tumor area (y axis, mean ± SEM) over time (x axis) of Mc38Ova hi (A) or B16Ova (B) implanted in wild-type (WT) mice and treated with anti-PD1 (A), anti-PD-L1 + anti-TIM3 (B), or isotype control. Right: frequency of CXCR6 + cells (y axis, mean ± SEM) in the indicated subsets (x axis) of CD8 + TILs harvested from tumors treated as above (A: n = 4–6 per group, 1 experiment. B: n = 3–4 per group, 1 experiment). (C) Expression (row-normalized TPM, color bar) of top differentially expressed genes (rows) between WT OTI (E8i-Cre - , Tcf7 FL/FL ) and Tcf7 cKO OTI (E8i-Cre + , Tcf7 FL/FL ) cells at different time points after T cell activation (columns) ( n = 3, 1 experiment). (D) Mean expression (color bar) and fraction of expressing cells (dot size) of key genes (rows) in different CD8 + T cell clusters (columns) as determined by scRNA-seq of cells from B16Ova tumors implanted in WT or Tcf7 cKO mice ( n = 3 per group combined, 1 experiment). (E) Frequency of CXCR6 + cells (y axis, mean ± SEM) in the indicated subsets (x axis) of CD8 + TILs from B16Ova tumors from WT (black) or Tcf7 cKO (green) mice ( n = 3–7 per group, representative of 2 experiments). (F) Percent input (y axis, mean ± SEM) following chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) PCR of the Cxcr6 locus with anti-TCF1 or rabbit IgG control antibodies (x axis) in WT or Tcf7 cKO CD8 + T cells ( n = 8, 5 experiments combined). (G–I) Luciferase activity (RLU, relative light unit, y axis, mean ± SEM) in HEK293T cells transfected with Cxcr6 locus-containing pGL4.10 luciferase reporters together with either empty vector (control) or vectors encoding the indicated transcription factors (x axis). Firefly luciferase activity is presented relative to constitutive Renilla luciferase activity ( n = 3, representative of 2 experiments). Statistical significance was determined by linear mixed model (A left, B left), Student’s unpaired t test (A right, B right, E, F comparing WT to Tcf7 cKO anti-TCF1 samples), Student’s paired t test (F comparing WT samples), or one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (G, H, I). NS = not significant, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.

    Journal: Cell Reports Medicine

    Article Title: Pan-cancer mapping of single CD8 + T cell profiles reveals a TCF1:CXCR6 axis regulating CD28 co-stimulation and anti-tumor immunity

    doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101640

    Figure Lengend Snippet: CXCR6 expression increases upon ICB and is repressed by TCF1 (A and B) Left: tumor area (y axis, mean ± SEM) over time (x axis) of Mc38Ova hi (A) or B16Ova (B) implanted in wild-type (WT) mice and treated with anti-PD1 (A), anti-PD-L1 + anti-TIM3 (B), or isotype control. Right: frequency of CXCR6 + cells (y axis, mean ± SEM) in the indicated subsets (x axis) of CD8 + TILs harvested from tumors treated as above (A: n = 4–6 per group, 1 experiment. B: n = 3–4 per group, 1 experiment). (C) Expression (row-normalized TPM, color bar) of top differentially expressed genes (rows) between WT OTI (E8i-Cre - , Tcf7 FL/FL ) and Tcf7 cKO OTI (E8i-Cre + , Tcf7 FL/FL ) cells at different time points after T cell activation (columns) ( n = 3, 1 experiment). (D) Mean expression (color bar) and fraction of expressing cells (dot size) of key genes (rows) in different CD8 + T cell clusters (columns) as determined by scRNA-seq of cells from B16Ova tumors implanted in WT or Tcf7 cKO mice ( n = 3 per group combined, 1 experiment). (E) Frequency of CXCR6 + cells (y axis, mean ± SEM) in the indicated subsets (x axis) of CD8 + TILs from B16Ova tumors from WT (black) or Tcf7 cKO (green) mice ( n = 3–7 per group, representative of 2 experiments). (F) Percent input (y axis, mean ± SEM) following chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) PCR of the Cxcr6 locus with anti-TCF1 or rabbit IgG control antibodies (x axis) in WT or Tcf7 cKO CD8 + T cells ( n = 8, 5 experiments combined). (G–I) Luciferase activity (RLU, relative light unit, y axis, mean ± SEM) in HEK293T cells transfected with Cxcr6 locus-containing pGL4.10 luciferase reporters together with either empty vector (control) or vectors encoding the indicated transcription factors (x axis). Firefly luciferase activity is presented relative to constitutive Renilla luciferase activity ( n = 3, representative of 2 experiments). Statistical significance was determined by linear mixed model (A left, B left), Student’s unpaired t test (A right, B right, E, F comparing WT to Tcf7 cKO anti-TCF1 samples), Student’s paired t test (F comparing WT samples), or one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (G, H, I). NS = not significant, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.

    Article Snippet: Anti-Mouse/Human TCF1 Clone C63D9 , Cell Signaling Technology , Cat:# 2203S; RRID: AB_2199302.

    Techniques: Expressing, Control, Activation Assay, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, Luciferase, Activity Assay, Transfection, Plasmid Preparation

    Journal: Cell Reports Medicine

    Article Title: Pan-cancer mapping of single CD8 + T cell profiles reveals a TCF1:CXCR6 axis regulating CD28 co-stimulation and anti-tumor immunity

    doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101640

    Figure Lengend Snippet:

    Article Snippet: Anti-Mouse/Human TCF1 Clone C63D9 , Cell Signaling Technology , Cat:# 2203S; RRID: AB_2199302.

    Techniques: Virus, Recombinant, Purification, SYBR Green Assay, Staining, Reporter Assay, In Vitro, Activation Assay, Generated, Luciferase, Plasmid Preparation, Sequencing, Software, CRISPR

    CXCR6 expression increases upon ICB and is repressed by TCF1 (A and B) Left: tumor area (y axis, mean ± SEM) over time (x axis) of Mc38Ova hi (A) or B16Ova (B) implanted in wild-type (WT) mice and treated with anti-PD1 (A), anti-PD-L1 + anti-TIM3 (B), or isotype control. Right: frequency of CXCR6 + cells (y axis, mean ± SEM) in the indicated subsets (x axis) of CD8 + TILs harvested from tumors treated as above (A: n = 4–6 per group, 1 experiment. B: n = 3–4 per group, 1 experiment). (C) Expression (row-normalized TPM, color bar) of top differentially expressed genes (rows) between WT OTI (E8i-Cre - , Tcf7 FL/FL ) and Tcf7 cKO OTI (E8i-Cre + , Tcf7 FL/FL ) cells at different time points after T cell activation (columns) ( n = 3, 1 experiment). (D) Mean expression (color bar) and fraction of expressing cells (dot size) of key genes (rows) in different CD8 + T cell clusters (columns) as determined by scRNA-seq of cells from B16Ova tumors implanted in WT or Tcf7 cKO mice ( n = 3 per group combined, 1 experiment). (E) Frequency of CXCR6 + cells (y axis, mean ± SEM) in the indicated subsets (x axis) of CD8 + TILs from B16Ova tumors from WT (black) or Tcf7 cKO (green) mice ( n = 3–7 per group, representative of 2 experiments). (F) Percent input (y axis, mean ± SEM) following chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) PCR of the Cxcr6 locus with anti-TCF1 or rabbit IgG control antibodies (x axis) in WT or Tcf7 cKO CD8 + T cells ( n = 8, 5 experiments combined). (G–I) Luciferase activity (RLU, relative light unit, y axis, mean ± SEM) in HEK293T cells transfected with Cxcr6 locus-containing pGL4.10 luciferase reporters together with either empty vector (control) or vectors encoding the indicated transcription factors (x axis). Firefly luciferase activity is presented relative to constitutive Renilla luciferase activity ( n = 3, representative of 2 experiments). Statistical significance was determined by linear mixed model (A left, B left), Student’s unpaired t test (A right, B right, E, F comparing WT to Tcf7 cKO anti-TCF1 samples), Student’s paired t test (F comparing WT samples), or one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (G, H, I). NS = not significant, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.

    Journal: Cell Reports Medicine

    Article Title: Pan-cancer mapping of single CD8 + T cell profiles reveals a TCF1:CXCR6 axis regulating CD28 co-stimulation and anti-tumor immunity

    doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101640

    Figure Lengend Snippet: CXCR6 expression increases upon ICB and is repressed by TCF1 (A and B) Left: tumor area (y axis, mean ± SEM) over time (x axis) of Mc38Ova hi (A) or B16Ova (B) implanted in wild-type (WT) mice and treated with anti-PD1 (A), anti-PD-L1 + anti-TIM3 (B), or isotype control. Right: frequency of CXCR6 + cells (y axis, mean ± SEM) in the indicated subsets (x axis) of CD8 + TILs harvested from tumors treated as above (A: n = 4–6 per group, 1 experiment. B: n = 3–4 per group, 1 experiment). (C) Expression (row-normalized TPM, color bar) of top differentially expressed genes (rows) between WT OTI (E8i-Cre - , Tcf7 FL/FL ) and Tcf7 cKO OTI (E8i-Cre + , Tcf7 FL/FL ) cells at different time points after T cell activation (columns) ( n = 3, 1 experiment). (D) Mean expression (color bar) and fraction of expressing cells (dot size) of key genes (rows) in different CD8 + T cell clusters (columns) as determined by scRNA-seq of cells from B16Ova tumors implanted in WT or Tcf7 cKO mice ( n = 3 per group combined, 1 experiment). (E) Frequency of CXCR6 + cells (y axis, mean ± SEM) in the indicated subsets (x axis) of CD8 + TILs from B16Ova tumors from WT (black) or Tcf7 cKO (green) mice ( n = 3–7 per group, representative of 2 experiments). (F) Percent input (y axis, mean ± SEM) following chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) PCR of the Cxcr6 locus with anti-TCF1 or rabbit IgG control antibodies (x axis) in WT or Tcf7 cKO CD8 + T cells ( n = 8, 5 experiments combined). (G–I) Luciferase activity (RLU, relative light unit, y axis, mean ± SEM) in HEK293T cells transfected with Cxcr6 locus-containing pGL4.10 luciferase reporters together with either empty vector (control) or vectors encoding the indicated transcription factors (x axis). Firefly luciferase activity is presented relative to constitutive Renilla luciferase activity ( n = 3, representative of 2 experiments). Statistical significance was determined by linear mixed model (A left, B left), Student’s unpaired t test (A right, B right, E, F comparing WT to Tcf7 cKO anti-TCF1 samples), Student’s paired t test (F comparing WT samples), or one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (G, H, I). NS = not significant, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.

    Article Snippet: Anti-Mouse/Human TCF1 PE Clone C63D9 , Cell Signaling Technology , Cat:# 14456S RRID: AB_2798483.

    Techniques: Expressing, Control, Activation Assay, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, Luciferase, Activity Assay, Transfection, Plasmid Preparation

    Journal: Cell Reports Medicine

    Article Title: Pan-cancer mapping of single CD8 + T cell profiles reveals a TCF1:CXCR6 axis regulating CD28 co-stimulation and anti-tumor immunity

    doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101640

    Figure Lengend Snippet:

    Article Snippet: Anti-Mouse/Human TCF1 PE Clone C63D9 , Cell Signaling Technology , Cat:# 14456S RRID: AB_2798483.

    Techniques: Virus, Recombinant, Purification, SYBR Green Assay, Staining, Reporter Assay, In Vitro, Activation Assay, Generated, Luciferase, Plasmid Preparation, Sequencing, Software, CRISPR

    Figure 3. LDRT15 Gy/5 f + aPD-1 treatment recruits TCF1+ PD-1+ CD8+ stem-like T cells (A) UMAP plot of 5,113 CD8+ T cells from scRNA-seq of untreated tumors and tumors treated with aPD-1, LDRT15 Gy/5 f, or LDRT15 Gy/5 f + aPD-1, colored by cell type. (B) Heatmap showing the expression of marker genes across CD8+ T cell subtypes. (C) Distribution of CD8+ T cell subtypes across treatment groups. Top bar plot showing the relative proportion of cells from four different treatment groups for each CD8+ T cell subtype. Bottom right heatmap showing enrichment scores of each CD8+ T cell subtype across treatment groups. The left bar plot shows the total number of CD8+ T cells in each treatment group.

    Journal: Med (New York, N.Y.)

    Article Title: Preclinical study and phase II trial of adapting low-dose radiotherapy to immunotherapy in small cell lung cancer.

    doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2024.06.002

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 3. LDRT15 Gy/5 f + aPD-1 treatment recruits TCF1+ PD-1+ CD8+ stem-like T cells (A) UMAP plot of 5,113 CD8+ T cells from scRNA-seq of untreated tumors and tumors treated with aPD-1, LDRT15 Gy/5 f, or LDRT15 Gy/5 f + aPD-1, colored by cell type. (B) Heatmap showing the expression of marker genes across CD8+ T cell subtypes. (C) Distribution of CD8+ T cell subtypes across treatment groups. Top bar plot showing the relative proportion of cells from four different treatment groups for each CD8+ T cell subtype. Bottom right heatmap showing enrichment scores of each CD8+ T cell subtype across treatment groups. The left bar plot shows the total number of CD8+ T cells in each treatment group.

    Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used: human CD3 (ZSGB-BIO, ZM-0417, 1:200), human CD8 (ZSGBBIO, ZA-0508, 1:400), human PD-1 (ZSGB-BIO, ZA-0381, 1:100), human TCF1 (CST, 2203, 1:400), human pan-CK (ZSGB-BIO, ZM-0069, 1:600) and DAPI.

    Techniques: Expressing, Marker

    Journal: Cell Reports Medicine

    Article Title: IL-7-primed bystander CD8 tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes optimize the antitumor efficacy of T cell engager immunotherapy

    doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101567

    Figure Lengend Snippet:

    Article Snippet: Anti-mouse/human TCF1 AF488 (clone: C63D9) , Cell Signaling , Cat# 6444S; RRID: AB_2797627.

    Techniques: Purification, Recombinant, Formulation, Flow Cytometry, Amplification, Software, Staining

    a , Schematic summary of the design of exploratory analyses. b , Box plots showing the fold change in proportions of immune cell types among PBMCs in long-term responders (LR; n = 9), early progressors (EP; n = 9) and both ( n = 18). c , PCC of each cell type between C1D1 and C1D15. d , Bar plots showing the TCR diversity, as represented by the inverse Simpson index for CD8 + T cells in LR ( n = 15) and EP ( n = 14) between C1D1 and C1D15. e , Box plots showing the fold change in the proportions of CD8 + T cell subclusters among NK/T cells among LR ( n = 9), EP ( n = 9) and both ( n = 18). f , Violin plots showing the module score for gene sets related to inflammatory signature (left) and nivolumab responsiveness in each CD8 + T cell cluster (right). g , Heat map showing expression levels of CD8 and genes related to cytotoxicity and T cell exhaustion among MKI67 + CD8 + T cells. h , Proportion of Ki-67 + cells among CD8 + T cells and PD-1 + CD8 + T cells, before and after treatment, among LR ( n = 7) and EP ( n = 8). i , Proportion of Granzyme B + perforin + cells among CD8 + T cells and PD-1 + CD8 + T cells, before and after treatment, among LR ( n = 7) and EP ( n = 8). Gating strategy of CD8 + T cells is shown in Extended Data Fig. . * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.005, **** P < 0.001, according to a Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired groups and two-tailed Mann–Whitney U -test for unpaired groups. Data are presented as mean ± s.d. In each box plot, the box represents the interquartile range, and whiskers represent minima and maxima. RCC, renal cell carcinoma.

    Journal: Nature Medicine

    Article Title: Regorafenib plus nivolumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: the phase 2 RENOBATE trial

    doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-02824-y

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a , Schematic summary of the design of exploratory analyses. b , Box plots showing the fold change in proportions of immune cell types among PBMCs in long-term responders (LR; n = 9), early progressors (EP; n = 9) and both ( n = 18). c , PCC of each cell type between C1D1 and C1D15. d , Bar plots showing the TCR diversity, as represented by the inverse Simpson index for CD8 + T cells in LR ( n = 15) and EP ( n = 14) between C1D1 and C1D15. e , Box plots showing the fold change in the proportions of CD8 + T cell subclusters among NK/T cells among LR ( n = 9), EP ( n = 9) and both ( n = 18). f , Violin plots showing the module score for gene sets related to inflammatory signature (left) and nivolumab responsiveness in each CD8 + T cell cluster (right). g , Heat map showing expression levels of CD8 and genes related to cytotoxicity and T cell exhaustion among MKI67 + CD8 + T cells. h , Proportion of Ki-67 + cells among CD8 + T cells and PD-1 + CD8 + T cells, before and after treatment, among LR ( n = 7) and EP ( n = 8). i , Proportion of Granzyme B + perforin + cells among CD8 + T cells and PD-1 + CD8 + T cells, before and after treatment, among LR ( n = 7) and EP ( n = 8). Gating strategy of CD8 + T cells is shown in Extended Data Fig. . * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.005, **** P < 0.001, according to a Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired groups and two-tailed Mann–Whitney U -test for unpaired groups. Data are presented as mean ± s.d. In each box plot, the box represents the interquartile range, and whiskers represent minima and maxima. RCC, renal cell carcinoma.

    Article Snippet: The following directly conjugated, unconjugated or secondary antibodies were used to identify cell markers of CD8 + T cells in human PBMCs: rabbit anti-human TCF1/TCF7 at 1:100 dilution (C63D9, Cell Signaling Technology, 2203S), donkey anti-rabbit IgG at 1:100 dilution (Poly4064, BioLegend, 406410), mouse anti-human CD3-V500 at 1:100 dilution (UCHT1, BD Biosciences, 561416), mouse anti-human Ki-67-BV605 at 1:100 dilution (Ki-67, BioLegend, 350522), mouse anti-human Perforin-BV711 at 1:100 dilution (dG9, BioLegend, 308130), pembrolizumab (PD-1, Selleck Chemicals, A2005), mouse anti-human IgG4 Fc-FITC at 1:100 dilution (HP6025, Southern Biotech, 9200-02), mouse anti-human CD45-PerCP-Cy5.5 at 1:100 dilution (HI30, BD Biosciences, 564105), mouse anti-human CD14-PE-TR at 1:200 dilution (61D3, eBioscience, 61-0149-42), mouse anti-human CD19-PE-TR at 1:200 dilution (HIB19, eBioscience, 61-0199-42), mouse anti-human Granzyme B Alexa Fluor 700 at 1:100 dilution (GB11, BD Biosciences, 560213) and mouse anti-human CD8-APC-H7 at 1:100 dilution (SK1, BD Biosciences, 560179).

    Techniques: Expressing, Two Tailed Test, MANN-WHITNEY

    a , Volcano plot showing proportional changes in total CD8 + T-cell subclusters at C1D1 between long-term responders (LR; n = 15) and early progressors (EP; n = 13). The unpaired T test was performed for unpaired groups. b , Heatmap of CD8 + T surrogate marker genes among total CD8 + T cells and subclusters. Red and blue astrerisks indicate genes significantly upregulated at C1D1 and C1D15, respectively. c , Gating strategy of CD8 + T-cells PBMC in LR and EP. d , Representative flow cytometry plots for KI-67-expressing cells among CD8 + T-cells. e , Representative flow cytometry plots for granzyme B- and perforin-expressing CD8 + T-cells. f , Heatmap of proliferation marker gene among CXCR3 + CD8 + T-cell and CXCR3 − CD8 + T-cell subclusters from an independent HCC cohort treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy (Chuah et al. 2022). g , Heatmap of CD8 + T surrogate marker genes among CXCR3 + CD8 + T-cell subcluster from the independent HCC cohort treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy (Chuah et al. 2022). *P < 0.05, according to a two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired groups.

    Journal: Nature Medicine

    Article Title: Regorafenib plus nivolumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: the phase 2 RENOBATE trial

    doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-02824-y

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a , Volcano plot showing proportional changes in total CD8 + T-cell subclusters at C1D1 between long-term responders (LR; n = 15) and early progressors (EP; n = 13). The unpaired T test was performed for unpaired groups. b , Heatmap of CD8 + T surrogate marker genes among total CD8 + T cells and subclusters. Red and blue astrerisks indicate genes significantly upregulated at C1D1 and C1D15, respectively. c , Gating strategy of CD8 + T-cells PBMC in LR and EP. d , Representative flow cytometry plots for KI-67-expressing cells among CD8 + T-cells. e , Representative flow cytometry plots for granzyme B- and perforin-expressing CD8 + T-cells. f , Heatmap of proliferation marker gene among CXCR3 + CD8 + T-cell and CXCR3 − CD8 + T-cell subclusters from an independent HCC cohort treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy (Chuah et al. 2022). g , Heatmap of CD8 + T surrogate marker genes among CXCR3 + CD8 + T-cell subcluster from the independent HCC cohort treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy (Chuah et al. 2022). *P < 0.05, according to a two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired groups.

    Article Snippet: The following directly conjugated, unconjugated or secondary antibodies were used to identify cell markers of CD8 + T cells in human PBMCs: rabbit anti-human TCF1/TCF7 at 1:100 dilution (C63D9, Cell Signaling Technology, 2203S), donkey anti-rabbit IgG at 1:100 dilution (Poly4064, BioLegend, 406410), mouse anti-human CD3-V500 at 1:100 dilution (UCHT1, BD Biosciences, 561416), mouse anti-human Ki-67-BV605 at 1:100 dilution (Ki-67, BioLegend, 350522), mouse anti-human Perforin-BV711 at 1:100 dilution (dG9, BioLegend, 308130), pembrolizumab (PD-1, Selleck Chemicals, A2005), mouse anti-human IgG4 Fc-FITC at 1:100 dilution (HP6025, Southern Biotech, 9200-02), mouse anti-human CD45-PerCP-Cy5.5 at 1:100 dilution (HI30, BD Biosciences, 564105), mouse anti-human CD14-PE-TR at 1:200 dilution (61D3, eBioscience, 61-0149-42), mouse anti-human CD19-PE-TR at 1:200 dilution (HIB19, eBioscience, 61-0199-42), mouse anti-human Granzyme B Alexa Fluor 700 at 1:100 dilution (GB11, BD Biosciences, 560213) and mouse anti-human CD8-APC-H7 at 1:100 dilution (SK1, BD Biosciences, 560179).

    Techniques: Marker, Flow Cytometry, Expressing